<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Protection Redux: The Lessons of History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/</link>
	<description>What happened to the global economy and what we can do about it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike L.</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent article by Professor Glickman. Having lived through the CPA and CPSA years on Capitol Hill, I must disagree, however, with the Wall St Journal comment. The CPA was not &quot;killed by words&quot;, but by words backed by big money. Until the campaign finance laws are changed to cap political contributions, or to allow public financing, a revival of the consumer protection ideal, whether through government agencies (effectively monitored), or consumer self- help mechanisms will be very difficult indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article by Professor Glickman. Having lived through the CPA and CPSA years on Capitol Hill, I must disagree, however, with the Wall St Journal comment. The CPA was not &#8220;killed by words&#8221;, but by words backed by big money. Until the campaign finance laws are changed to cap political contributions, or to allow public financing, a revival of the consumer protection ideal, whether through government agencies (effectively monitored), or consumer self- help mechanisms will be very difficult indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reform of our financial system is absolutely necessary. However, you have not made the case that consumer protection  is what is needed. The frontrunning, pump and dump, naked short selling antics of the big Wall Street investment banks primarily hurt those companies listed on the exchanges, not the consumer. The average Joe consumer does not invest in those exotic derivatives either. It&#039;s the entire economy that took that hit. 

One of the biggest areas where consumers need to be protected is how their credit card loans are treated. At a time. when the big banks are getting nearly free money from the Fed, those same banks have jacked credit card interest to over 20% on millions of people who are struggling to pay their bills. One would think that Congress would attack that problem. 

Oops, I forgot. They did already, and the end result was that credit card payments went way up  not down! Those same compassionate so called liberals who are &quot;always looking out for the little guy&quot; once again stuck it to the little guy. 

And these are the same crooks and liars you  want to entrust more consumer protection legislation, after this Congress and President has given billions to Soros, the Unions, ACORN and their biggest Wall Street contributors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reform of our financial system is absolutely necessary. However, you have not made the case that consumer protection  is what is needed. The frontrunning, pump and dump, naked short selling antics of the big Wall Street investment banks primarily hurt those companies listed on the exchanges, not the consumer. The average Joe consumer does not invest in those exotic derivatives either. It&#8217;s the entire economy that took that hit. </p>
<p>One of the biggest areas where consumers need to be protected is how their credit card loans are treated. At a time. when the big banks are getting nearly free money from the Fed, those same banks have jacked credit card interest to over 20% on millions of people who are struggling to pay their bills. One would think that Congress would attack that problem. </p>
<p>Oops, I forgot. They did already, and the end result was that credit card payments went way up  not down! Those same compassionate so called liberals who are &#8220;always looking out for the little guy&#8221; once again stuck it to the little guy. </p>
<p>And these are the same crooks and liars you  want to entrust more consumer protection legislation, after this Congress and President has given billions to Soros, the Unions, ACORN and their biggest Wall Street contributors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traderwalt</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Traderwalt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumer protection is also about education.  Municipal bond brokers advertising on the radio every morning begin with, &quot;investing in bonds involves possible loss of principal&quot;. A simple warning that is repeated every time the ad runs.

I wonder if a similar warning to mortgage buyers would make a difference.  Suppose the sales person was required to say  &quot;the mortgage you are about to purchase can increase to $2200 per month from $1000 if you miss only one payment or that payment is late.  Furthermore, you are obligated to make these payments for x number of years even if one or both signers lose his or her job, divorce, or cannot work due to illness&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer protection is also about education.  Municipal bond brokers advertising on the radio every morning begin with, &#8220;investing in bonds involves possible loss of principal&#8221;. A simple warning that is repeated every time the ad runs.</p>
<p>I wonder if a similar warning to mortgage buyers would make a difference.  Suppose the sales person was required to say  &#8220;the mortgage you are about to purchase can increase to $2200 per month from $1000 if you miss only one payment or that payment is late.  Furthermore, you are obligated to make these payments for x number of years even if one or both signers lose his or her job, divorce, or cannot work due to illness&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another thanks. This makes checking the comments worthwhile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thanks. This makes checking the comments worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake chase</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jake chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excellent article. I hate to interrupt the cheering for the CFPA, but has anyone noticed the performance history of the SEC? Consumers of credit have a simple choice: take the deal or go without the stuff. In a world of shrinking wages, that will continue to be a non choice for too many. It won&#039;t help to publish the sleezy terms in fourteen point type, and what about all those trees? The Democrats always jump on this kind of band wagon; it gives them a convenient hobby horse they can ride and ride, without stepping on any contributor toes. No doubt the CFPA will be the triumph of our silvertongued president&#039;s first administration. But I wouldn&#039;t confuse it with an assault on monopoly capital, or expect it to have any significant effect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article. I hate to interrupt the cheering for the CFPA, but has anyone noticed the performance history of the SEC? Consumers of credit have a simple choice: take the deal or go without the stuff. In a world of shrinking wages, that will continue to be a non choice for too many. It won&#8217;t help to publish the sleezy terms in fourteen point type, and what about all those trees? The Democrats always jump on this kind of band wagon; it gives them a convenient hobby horse they can ride and ride, without stepping on any contributor toes. No doubt the CFPA will be the triumph of our silvertongued president&#8217;s first administration. But I wouldn&#8217;t confuse it with an assault on monopoly capital, or expect it to have any significant effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bayard</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, for one, do believe that consumers are capable of making their own decisions, and being responsible for the outcomes of bad ones.  I also believe that the proposed CFPA is, in fact, a good idea.  Consumers can make the best decisions, when and if they are presented with a complete and clear picture of what they are deciding to do, and if they know the alternative choices available to them.  For me the CFPA would do no more than protect them from devious legally opaque financial products, and serve to eliminate products that would harm them by outlawing them.  After all, there are some financial products which would be dangerous for anyone to choose, lots of them!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, do believe that consumers are capable of making their own decisions, and being responsible for the outcomes of bad ones.  I also believe that the proposed CFPA is, in fact, a good idea.  Consumers can make the best decisions, when and if they are presented with a complete and clear picture of what they are deciding to do, and if they know the alternative choices available to them.  For me the CFPA would do no more than protect them from devious legally opaque financial products, and serve to eliminate products that would harm them by outlawing them.  After all, there are some financial products which would be dangerous for anyone to choose, lots of them!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakkis</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yakkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporations are like guardian angels to us. They are so wonderful and wonderous.  They were incorporated in heaven.  Jesus ran one back in the day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporations are like guardian angels to us. They are so wonderful and wonderous.  They were incorporated in heaven.  Jesus ran one back in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPinter</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TPinter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You strike at the heart of the issue: Would you trust government over corporations. Of course not. The free market hypothesis insures that markets, read corporations, would never exploit consumers since they would go out of business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You strike at the heart of the issue: Would you trust government over corporations. Of course not. The free market hypothesis insures that markets, read corporations, would never exploit consumers since they would go out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakkis</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yakkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One party?  Try both parties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One party?  Try both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakkis</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yakkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we all know there&#039;s &quot;regulation&quot; and there&#039;s regulation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all know there&#8217;s &#8220;regulation&#8221; and there&#8217;s regulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakkis</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yakkis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That happened too to me, but only when I used the word
C0nspir@cy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That happened too to me, but only when I used the word<br />
C0nspir@cy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And can I ask, how can the addition of ANY regulatory agency be &quot;yet another regulatory layer&quot; in a sector that seems without any regulation whatsoever?

I realize that the &quot;banking sector&quot; is regulated.  But there&#039;s that whole &quot;shadow banking sector&quot; that grew up without any parental rules or involvement whatsoever - and that seems to be the area most heavily involved in the crisis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And can I ask, how can the addition of ANY regulatory agency be &#8220;yet another regulatory layer&#8221; in a sector that seems without any regulation whatsoever?</p>
<p>I realize that the &#8220;banking sector&#8221; is regulated.  But there&#8217;s that whole &#8220;shadow banking sector&#8221; that grew up without any parental rules or involvement whatsoever &#8211; and that seems to be the area most heavily involved in the crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a great link, Ted.  Thanks for posting it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great link, Ted.  Thanks for posting it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yes, the conservative populists within the GOP - so successful in shrieking &quot;JUST SAY NO TO EVERYTHING&quot; louder than anyone else in the world.

Wondering when they&#039;ll realize that their base has been decimated by the prevailing GOP philosophy that government is root of all evil.

Last I checked, it was the GOP who not only decided to transform a huge surplus into a massive deficit (one of the largest failed government stimulus programs ever - huge sums spent without a job created outside of Halliburton...)

And it was the GOP who decided last fall to create the largest federal intervention into the financial sector - an intervention that was essential... or else.

Regulatory oversight of the financial sector is absolutely critical - not just to protect consumers, but to protect the entire economy from catastrophic failure.

Instead of saying &quot;no&quot; - the GOP should be working their asses off to create regulations that diminish risk without destroying incentives to innovate.  

Optimist that I am, I believe firmly such an environment can be created - but not if one party decides to remove itself completely from all thoughtful dialogue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, the conservative populists within the GOP &#8211; so successful in shrieking &#8220;JUST SAY NO TO EVERYTHING&#8221; louder than anyone else in the world.</p>
<p>Wondering when they&#8217;ll realize that their base has been decimated by the prevailing GOP philosophy that government is root of all evil.</p>
<p>Last I checked, it was the GOP who not only decided to transform a huge surplus into a massive deficit (one of the largest failed government stimulus programs ever &#8211; huge sums spent without a job created outside of Halliburton&#8230;)</p>
<p>And it was the GOP who decided last fall to create the largest federal intervention into the financial sector &#8211; an intervention that was essential&#8230; or else.</p>
<p>Regulatory oversight of the financial sector is absolutely critical &#8211; not just to protect consumers, but to protect the entire economy from catastrophic failure.</p>
<p>Instead of saying &#8220;no&#8221; &#8211; the GOP should be working their asses off to create regulations that diminish risk without destroying incentives to innovate.  </p>
<p>Optimist that I am, I believe firmly such an environment can be created &#8211; but not if one party decides to remove itself completely from all thoughtful dialogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted K</title>
		<link>http://baselinescenario.com/2009/09/07/consumer-protection-redux/#comment-27047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baselinescenario.com/?p=4920#comment-27047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great post by Professor Glickman.  I always like when the &quot;baseline&quot; site gets some contributors from outside, who hold the site&#039;s same basic philosophy on improved financial regulation but can give us some freshness in the way they present their views.  Professor Glickman&#039;s view from his knowledge and perspective definitely adds a strong and sturdy pillar to the argument for the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA).  Alan Blinder wrote a related piece in the New York Times that is worth the few minutes it takes to read.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/business/economy/06view.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great post by Professor Glickman.  I always like when the &#8220;baseline&#8221; site gets some contributors from outside, who hold the site&#8217;s same basic philosophy on improved financial regulation but can give us some freshness in the way they present their views.  Professor Glickman&#8217;s view from his knowledge and perspective definitely adds a strong and sturdy pillar to the argument for the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA).  Alan Blinder wrote a related piece in the New York Times that is worth the few minutes it takes to read.<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/business/economy/06view.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/business/economy/06view.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

