Our Twitter Feed
- Cute: http://t.co/rzK8VjXl. But is it fair to call "ignorance" the result of a steady stream of lies amplified by the media? 5 hours ago
- Purebred dog shows have always been creepy. This just confirms it: http://t.co/6iu2bwjR. /JK 9 hours ago
- Felix Salmon mocking Jack Welch's vacuous management lesson for Facebook http://t.co/oowi0zHZ /JK 1 day ago
- New post: Why Do Investors Pay Lower Taxes Than Workers? http://t.co/Paqo6laS #fb 1 day ago
- New post: Mark Zuckerberg and Tax Policy http://t.co/AQSv0jAf #fb 2 days ago
Tweets About Us- RT @baselinescene: Cute: http://t.co/rzK8VjXl. But is it fair to call "ignorance" the result of a steady stream of lies amplified by the media? emmett_j@twitter.com (Emmett Johnson)
- RT @baselinescene: Cute: http://t.co/rzK8VjXl. But is it fair to call "ignorance" the result of a steady stream of lies amplified by the media? JoScoMac@twitter.com (Scott McLean)
- RT @baselinescene: Purebred dog shows have always been creepy. This just confirms it: http://t.co/6iu2bwjR. /JK gebersole@twitter.com (Garrett Ebersole)
- RT @baselinescene: Purebred dog shows have always been creepy. This just confirms it: http://t.co/6iu2bwjR. /JK april_harding@twitter.com (April Harding)
- RT @baselinescene: Purebred dog shows have always been creepy. This just confirms it: http://t.co/6iu2bwjR. /JK APogonowski@twitter.com (AP)
- RT @baselinescene: Purebred dog shows have always been creepy. This just confirms it: http://t.co/6iu2bwjR. /JK jamiesw@twitter.com (JamieSW)
- The Bear&Bull Blog Daily is out! http://t.co/mcAbzHbi ▸ Top stories today via @thestalwart @baselinescene bearbull@twitter.com (bearbull)
- RT @TheBrowser: Mean-Spirited, Bad Economics: @baselinescene on unemployment benefits & Republican party plans to cut them http://t.co/GVnNzAUN drooperman@twitter.com (Drew)
- Agree with RT @baselinescene: Felix Salmon mocking Jack Welch's vacuous management lesson for Facebook http://t.co/BBKIGOIl /JK Alheri@twitter.com (Lilly Evans)
- #FF for political and other insight: @SarahBarfield @BuddyRoemer @RoyBlunt @StartSnitching @delong @TheGoodReport @baselinescene normanwlucas@twitter.com (Norman Lucas)
Links
- Angry Bear
- Brad DeLong
- Calculated Risk
- Econbrowser
- EconLog
- Economic Principals
- EconomicsUK
- Economist’s View
- Economists’ Forum at Financial Times
- Ezra Klein
- Felix Salmon
- Free exchange (The Economist)
- iMFdirect
- Interfluidity
- Macroadvisers
- Marginal Revolution
- MIT Sloan experts
- Money Supply (FT)
- naked capitalism
- New Deal 2.0
- Nouriel Roubini
- NPR Planet Money
- OECD Insights
- Paul Krugman
- Paul Solman
- Peterson Institute: Crisis Watch
- Rational Irrationality
- Real Time Economics (WSJ)
- Rortybomb
- Sense on Cents
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- The Pareto Commons
- TripleCrisis
- Washington Outside
- Washington's Blog
Get Updates!
Navigation
Our Book
More Stuff by Us
-
Recent Posts
- Why Do Investors Pay Lower Taxes Than Workers?
- Mark Zuckerberg and Tax Policy
- Stock or Cash?
- Mean-Spirited, Bad Economics
- Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg
- Private Equity and “Job Creation”
- What Did the SEC Really Do in 2004?
- What Is Private Equity?
- Breakthrough: Eric Schneiderman To Chair Mortgage Crisis Unit
- Should We Trust Paid Experts On The Volcker Rule?
- What Do Companies Do with Their Political Spending?
- Department of “Duh”
Tags
aig auto industry bailout Banking Bank of America banks budget deficit CFPA China citigroup Consumer Protection deficit derivatives economics education Elizabeth Warren Emerging Markets eurozone Federal Reserve financial regulation g20 Geithner Global Crisis goldman sachs government debt health care housing imf inflation insurance international macroeconomics Medicare mortgages nationalization politics real economy recapitalization regulation regulatory reform stimulus TARP taxes technology too big to failCategories
Archives

419,000 Jobs Vanish
November 7, 2008 in Commentary
Tags: recession, stimulus
240,000 jobs lost in October; September revised from 159,000 to 284,000; August from 73,000 to 127,000. That’s 419,000 jobs less than we thought we had a month ago. It’s 651,000 less than there were three months ago. And because we need 140,000 new jobs each month just to keep place with population growth, that’s over 1 million fewer jobs than the economy would need to maintain unemployment where it was three months ago. Unfortunately, everyone expects this quarter and next quarter to be worse than last quarter. On top of that, unemployment is a lagging indicator: because of the transaction costs in firing and hiring workers, companies exhaust their other cost-cutting opportunities before laying people off, and they don’t hire again until they are certain that the economy is growing again.
More than 22% of the unemployed have been out of work more than six months, which is usually when unemployment benefits expire. For this and other reasons, only 32% of the unemployed were receiving state benefits in October. These are more reasons to expand unemployment benefits in multiple directions, at the very least for a limited time period. Alan Krueger has described the other ways our unemployment insurance system is broken.
Unfortunately, there is fear that President Bush (remember him?) will veto the stimulus package, including extended unemployment benefits, that the Democrats want to pass in November, thereby accomplishing nothing except delaying it by two months. Sigh.
Share this:
Like this: